For an administration that was going to turn its back on Asia, Donald Trump's team has spent an awful lot of time in the region since the new US President took office in January.
Standing aboard the USS Ronald Reagan in Japan this week, Vice-President Mike Pence said dramatically the ship's steel deck "literally signifies the ironclad alliance our country enjoys with Japan, and our enduring commitment to the Asia-Pacific".
Pence's comments echoed his assurances in South Korea and followed similar statements made by Defence Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who came before him, with all three stressing the US was "unwavering" and "100 per cent" committed to its alliances in the region.
Six month's ago "unwavering" was not an adjective used to describe Donald Trump's commitment to the region. As a presidential candidate he asked whether the US should scale back its military presence in the region or at least force partners like Japan and Korea to bear more of the associated costs.
On his first day in office, he pulled the US out of the biggest multilateral trade deal ever negotiated, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which was the cornerstone of the Obama administration's pivot to Asia. The trade deal would have given the US more economic clout in the region to rival China. These policy signals prompted a wave of speculation about whether Trump would withdraw from Asia as he sought to "put America first".
But as he nears the 100-day mark in his presidency, clearly this hasn't happened.
"Trump is not shaping up to be an isolationist in Asia," writes research fellow at the United States Study Centre at the University of Sydney, Ashley Townshend - in his recently released report on the new administration's Asia policy.
"In fact, he may prove to be more forcefully engaged than many US allies and partners will like. Since the election, Trump has outlined hard-line positions on China, Taiwan, and North Korea, raising the spectre of greater instability in the region."
While Mattis and Tillerson "have moderated his more extreme pronouncements, the region can still expect a harder and more self-interested Asia policy from the United States".
Rather than withdrawing from the region, Trump has been remarkably proactive. He has met Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe twice since taking office – giving him more face-time than any other world leader – and he also held a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping at his exclusive Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach this month. It was confirmed this week Trump will attend a series of regional meetings later in the year, including the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation leaders meeting in Vietnam.
However, it's not all smooth sailing. Trump was forced to back down on his call for a review of the 'One China' policy, which recognises Beijing's claim over Taiwan. And this week, Pence's messages of reassurance were blunted by controversy over some misleading statements made by the White House on the whereabouts of a US strike group, supposedly en route to the Korean Peninsula.
While Pence addressed service members on the USS Ronald Reagan on Wednesday, the headlines were focused on a different aircraft carrier – the USS Carl Vinson. Trump claimed last week he was sending a "powerful armada" to waters off the Korean Peninsula. It has since emerged the USS Carl Vinson was sailing in a different direction at the time, to the Indian Ocean for joint exercises with the Australian navy.
"Saying that there are military options on the table does not mean that those options are good," writes Haggard. "And saying that strategic patience is over does not mean that the administration has anything more coherent up its sleeve. After saying that strategic patience was dead, the Vice-President immediately pivoted to underline how the US was going to work with 'allies and partners', including China, to turn this around. No one thinks such a turnaround is likely to be particularly swift."